Left main bifurcation stenting: the impact of strut thickness on long-term outcomes

Gianluca Rigatelli; Marco Zuin

doi:10.11909/j.issn.1671-5411.2021.02.008

Volume 18 Issue 2

Mar. 2021

Turn off MathJax

Article Contents

Article Navigation > Journal of Geriatric Cardiology > 2021 > 18(2): 91-93

Please cite this article as: Rigatelli G, Zuin M. Left main bifurcation stenting: the impact of strut thickness on long-term outcomes. J Geriatr Cardiol 2021; 18(2): 91−93. DOI: 10.11909/j.issn.1671-5411.2021.02.008

Citation:

Please cite this article as: Rigatelli G, Zuin M. Left main bifurcation stenting: the impact of strut thickness on long-term outcomes. J Geriatr Cardiol 2021; 18(2): 91−93. DOI: 10.11909/j.issn.1671-5411.2021.02.008

Citation:

PDF( 2143 KB)

Left main bifurcation stenting: the impact of strut thickness on long-term outcomes

doi: 10.11909/j.issn.1671-5411.2021.02.008

Gianluca Rigatelli^{1
,
,},
Marco Zuin²

1.
Cardiovascular Diagnosis and Endoluminal Interventions Unit, Rovigo General Hospital, Rovigo, Italy
2.
Section of Internal and Cardiopulmonary Medicine, University of Ferrara, Ferrara, Italy

More Information

Corresponding author: jackyheart@libero.it
Publish Date: 2021-03-05

Abstract

FullText(HTML)

References(10)

References

[1]	Rigatelli G, Zuin M, Nikolov P, et al. One-year and three-year outcomes of percutaneous bifurcation left main revascularization with modern drug-eluting stents: a systematic review and meta-analysis. Clin Res Cardiol 2021; 110: 1−11. doi: 10.1007/s00392-020-01679-w
[2]	Colombo A, Bramucci E, Saccà S, et al. Randomized study of the crush technique versus provisional side-branch stenting in true coronary bifurcations: the CACTUS (Coronary Bifurcations: Application of the Crushing Technique Using Sirolimus-Eluting Stents) Study. Circulation 2009; 119: 71−78. doi: 10.1161/CIRCULATIONAHA.108.808402
[3]	Chen SL, Zhang JJ, Han Y, et al. Double kissing crush versus provisional stenting for left main distal bifurcation lesions: DKCRUSH-V randomized trial. J Am Coll Cardiol 2017; 70: 2605−2617. doi: 10.1016/j.jacc.2017.09.1066
[4]	Kandzari DE, Gershlick AH, Serruys PW, et al. Outcomes among patients undergoing distal left main percutaneous coronary intervention. Circ Cardiovasc Interv 2018; 11: e007007. doi: 10.1161/CIRCINTERVENTIONS
[5]	Beier S, Ormiston J, Webster M, et al. Impact of bifurcation angle and other anatomical characteristics on blood flow: a computational study of non-stented and stented coronary arteries. J Biomech 2016; 49: 1570−1582. doi: 10.1016/j.jbiomech.2016.03.038
[6]	Rigatelli G, Zuin M, Dash D. Thin and crush: the new mantra in left main stenting? World J Cardiol 2018; 10: 191−195. doi: 10.4330/wjc.v10.i11.191
[7]	Geith MA, Nothdurfter L, Heiml M, et al. Quantifying stent-induced damage in coronary arteries by investigating mechanical and structural alterations. Acta Biomater 2020; 116: 285−301. doi: 10.1016/j.actbio.2020.08.016
[8]	Zun PS, Narracott AJ, Evans PC, et al. A particle-based model for endothelial cell migration under flow conditions. Biomech Model Mechanobiol 2020; 19: 681−692. doi: 10.1007/s10237-019-01239-w
[9]	Rigatelli G, Zuin M, Dell’Avvocata F, et al. Evaluation of potential substrates for restenosis and thrombosis in overlapped versus edge-to-edge juxtaposed bioabsorbable scaffolds: insights from a computed fluid dynamic study. Cardiovasc Revasc Med 2018; 19: 273−278. doi: 10.1016/j.carrev.2017.08.005
[10]	Rigatelli G, Zuin M, Dell’Avvocata F, et al. Evaluation of coronary flow conditions in complex coronary artery bifurcations stenting using computational fluid dynamics: impact of final proximal optimization technique on different double-stent techniques. Cardiovasc Revasc Med 2017; 18: 233−240. doi: 10.1016/j.carrev.2017.01.002