Please cite this article as: Niaga KJK, Supinto PA, Tjandra KC, Martin A, Drew C, Seno KHNH, Felix, Nugraha LAK, Tantowi F. Safety and efficacy of low-density lipoprotein-lowering drugs in the elderly: a network meta-analysis of randomized controlled trials. J Geriatr Cardiol 2026; 23(8): 515−528. DOI: 10.26599/1671-5411.2026.08.004.
Citation: Please cite this article as: Niaga KJK, Supinto PA, Tjandra KC, Martin A, Drew C, Seno KHNH, Felix, Nugraha LAK, Tantowi F. Safety and efficacy of low-density lipoprotein-lowering drugs in the elderly: a network meta-analysis of randomized controlled trials. J Geriatr Cardiol 2026; 23(8): 515−528. DOI: 10.26599/1671-5411.2026.08.004.

Safety and efficacy of low-density lipoprotein-lowering drugs in the elderly: a network meta-analysis of randomized controlled trials

  • BACKGROUND  Balancing the efficacy of low-density lipoprotein (LDL) reduction with safety presents a significant challenge in the elderly care. While guidelines recommended high-intensity statins as the optimal strategy to lower LDL in high-risk individuals, there are prevailing concerns regarding its side effects and subsequent fatality rate. The effectiveness of different LDL-lowering therapies in this population is also unclear. This study aims to compare the safety and efficacy of various LDL-lowering strategies in elderly population.
    METHODS  A systematic search was conducted through six databases until March 2025. Randomized controlled trials (RCTs) that evaluate LDL-lowering agents were included. The primary outcome was adverse effects, while secondary outcomes included composite cardiovascular disease (CVD) events, CVD related mortality, all-cause mortality, and LDL level reduction. Risk of bias was assessed using the RoB-2 tool. A network meta-analyses were performed to compare the safety and efficacy with subgroup analysis based on underlying CVD under the cumulative ranking values.
    RESULTS  Sixteen RCTs (n = 43,625) with low to moderate risk of bias were included. Among interventions evaluated for adverse events, moderate-intensity pitavastatin had the highest probability of being the safest. Ezetimibe demonstrated the most favorable safety profile for reducing CVD mortality, while evolocumab was most effective in lowering all-cause mortality. For LDL reduction, the combination of moderate-intensity pitavastatin and ezetimibe was the most effective, followed by moderate-intensity rosuvastatin plus ezetimibe. Subgroup analyses revealed significant differences between CVD and non-CVD populations in CVD mortality (P = 0.0059), CVD events (P = 0.0096), and LDL reduction (P = 0.0100), with more pronounced effects in the non-CVD group, suggesting greater efficacy in primary prevention.
    CONCLUSIONS  Moderate-intensity pitavastatin showed the highest safety profile, while its combination with ezetimibe was the most effective for LDL reduction.
  • loading

Catalog

    /

    DownLoad:  Full-Size Img  PowerPoint
    Return
    Return